Drop Down Menu

Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Worlds of Exile and Illusion by Le Guin


Title: Worlds of Exile and Illusion
Includes: The first 3 books in the Hainish Cycle -
Rocannon's World; Planet of Exile; City of Illusions


Author: Ursula K. Le Guin (American, 1929-2018)
Originally published: 1966-1967
Page count: 110; 98; 156


Dates read: 9/25/19-10/02/19; 10/11/19-10/29/19
2019 book goal progress: 31 out of 41
Back to the Classics category: 20th Century Classic


Read my other book reviews for the challenge HERE.


Rocannon's World (book 1)
Description on back of book:
Earth-scientist Rocannon has been leading an ethnological survey on a remote world populated by three native races: the cavern-dwelling Gdemiar, the elvish Fiia, and the warrior clan, Liuar. But when the technologically primitive planet is suddenly invaded by a fleet of ships from the stars, rebels against the League of All Worlds, Rocannon is the only survey member left alive. Marooned among alien peoples, he leads the battle to free this newly discovered world and finds that legends grow around him as he fights.

First sentence:
"How can you tell the legend from the fact on these worlds that lie so many years away?"

CAWPILE Rating: Overall - 8.4 - ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Characters      - 9
Atmosphere   - 10
Writing Style - 8
Plot                - 7
Intrigue          - 8
Logic             - 9
Enjoyment     - 8
What is a CAWPILE Rating?

Review:
This was a great story! I loved the world-building and all the different intelligent beings - most of which communicate through mindspeech (telepathy). They ride windsteeds, which are huge cats with wings. I wish we knew more about the League of All Worlds and where Rocannon actually came from. The book says of Rocannon: "By blood, I'm entirely of my mother's race; my father, who was Terran adopted me. This is the custom when different species, who cannot conceive, marry." It also says his mother is from Hain and, upon further research, I discovered that Terran is Earth. The Hainish colonized Terran so it could become a part of the League of All Worlds. So Rocannon is Hainish, but seems to have grown up on Earth/Terran,

Favorite quotes:
"'In times like this, one man's fate is not important.'
'If it is not, what is?'"

"There is darkness over my lineage. My mother, whom you knew, was lost in the forests in her madness; my father was killed in battle, my husband by treachery; and when I bore a son my spirit grieved amid my joy, foreseeing his life would be short. But my part of the darkness is to rule a failing domain alone, to live and live and outlive them all."

Planet of Exile (book 2)
Description on back of book:
The Earth colony of Landin has been stranded on the planet Werel for ten years - which is 600 terrestrial years. The lonely and dwindling human settlement is beginning to feel the strain. Every winter, the Earthmen have neighbors: the humanoid and nomadic people, called Hilfs, who only settle down for the snow season. The Hilfs fear the Earthmen, but they have a common enemy: the hordes of ravaging barbarians called Gaals and eerie preying snowghouls. Will they join forces or be annihilated?

First sentence:
"In the last days of the last moonphase of Autumn, a wind blew from the northern ranges through the dying forests of Askatevar, a cold wind that smelled of smoke and snow."

CAWPILE Rating: Overall - 9 - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Characters      - 10
Atmosphere   - 10
Writing Style - 9
Plot                - 8
Intrigue          - 9
Logic             - 8
Enjoyment     - 9

Review:
I really enjoyed this book - the world-building was great! One year on the planet equals 60 terrestrial years, each season lasts for 15 terrestrial years, and a moonphase lasts 1 terrestrial year. There's war, there's forbidden romance, and there's a clash of pre-wheel technology with futuristic/space-travel technology. I wanted there to be so much more to the story, but, for how short it was, there was a lot crammed in. There is no connection to the first book except that the Earthmen are a part of the League of All Worlds and a passing mention that they are descendants of Rocannon.

Favorite quotes:
"It is very hard to know the truth in stories that come from far away, from other tribes in other ranges."

"He was evidently and acknowledgly their leader. No especial reason for this was visible unless it was the vigor with which he moved and spoke; is authority noticeable in the man, or in the men about him?"

City of Illusions (book 3)
Description on back of book:
He was a fully grown man, alone in dense forest, with no trail to show where he had come from and no memory to tell who — or what — he was. His eyes are not the eyes of a human. The forest people took him in and raised him almost as a child, but they could not solve the riddle of his past. He decides to set out on a perilous quest to Es Toch, the City of the Shing, the Enemy of Mankind. There he will find his true self ... and a universe of danger.

First sentences:
"Imagine darkness. In the darkness that faces outward from the sun, a mute spirit woke. Wholly involved in chaos, he knew no pattern. He has no language and did not know the darkness to be night."

CAWPILE Rating: Overall - 9.1 - ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Characters      - 10
Atmosphere   - 8
Writing Style - 9
Plot                - 9
Intrigue          - 10
Logic             - 8
Enjoyment     - 10

Review:
This was a much more complex story than the first two and I loved it! It is my understanding that this book takes place about 600 years after the second book and gives a history of what happened to the Earthman and Hilfs. The book takes place on Earth where Mindspeech used to be a normal thing and everyone trusted one another because, unlike verbal speech, people are unable to lie when using telepathy. BUT then the Shing came and they could mind-lie, so no one uses mindspeech anymore and the Shing rule over Earth.

The Shing have one Law: Reverance for Life. This is then translated into "Do Not Kill." This is one of their great lies because, though the Shing don't kill bodies, they wipe minds and let people go in the wild. The idea this book brings up is that life is more than just physiologically living - it stresses the importance of memories, intelligence, and trust. The reader is told one thing throughout the first half of the book and then the whole thing is flipped on its head and you no longer know what's true and what isn't. I could say so much more but I don't want to give anything away - plus this is getting to be a pretty long review.

Favorite quotes:
"The game must be played, and played their way, though they made all the rules and had all the skill. His ineptitude did not matter. His honesty did. He was staked now totally on one belief: that an honest man cannot be cheated, that truth, if the game be played through right to the end, will lead to truth."

"Seen rightly, any situation, even chaos or a trap, would come clear and lead of itself to its one proper outcome; for there is, in the long run, no disharmony, only misunderstanding, no chance or mischance but only the ignorant eye."

Conclusion:
This was such a fun read! The books went from good to great to incredible. I just wish the first book was a little more connected to the other two or that we at least knew how much time elapsed between the first and second stories. They all reference the League of All Worlds, which is an alliance of 80 planets that speak a shared/universal language called Galaktica - in addition to their native languages.

These books are the first three stories in The Hainish Cycle. Hain is a planet - which none of these first stories were set in. We know from book 1 that Rocannon is Hainish, which would mean the Earthmen in book 2 are of Hainish descent, which then connects to book 3 - but I'm not going to tell you how. Book three also mentions Hainish instruments. The Hainish Cycle includes 7 novels/novellas, 2 short story collections, and 6 other individual short stories. I look forward to reading more of the series - the next book is The Left Hand of Darkness, which launched Le Guin's writing career.

Now I'm off to read another book... but since a review should be more about the author of the book than about the writer of the blog, I will let Ursula K. Le Guin have the last words:

"Hope is a slighter, tougher thing than even trust. In a good season one trusts life; in a bad season one only hopes. Without trust, a man lives, but not a human life; without hope, he dies." -City of Illusions

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

The Battle of Life by Dickens


Title: The Battle of Life


Author: Charles Dickens (English, 1812-1870)
Originally published:  1846
Page count: 88 (Av. of several versions: 120)


Dates read: 10/4/19-10/9/19
2019 book goal progress: 28 out of 41
Back to the Classics category: 
Classic Novella (under 250 pages)

Read my other Dickens at Christmas reviews HERE.

Read my other book reviews for the challenge HERE.


Description on back of book:
The Battle of Life: A Love Story is the 4th of Charles Dickens' five "Christmas Books." The setting is an English village that stands on the site of a historic battle. Some characters refer to the battle as a metaphor for the struggles of life, hence the title.

First sentence:
"Once upon a time, it matters little when, and in stalwart England, it matters little where, a fierce battle was fought."

CAWPILE Rating: Overall - 5.1 - ⭐⭐⭐
Characters      - 5
Atmosphere   - 4
Writing Style - 8
Plot                - 6
Intrigue          - 6
Logic             - 3
Enjoyment     - 4
What is a CAWPILE Rating?

Review:
I did not like this story and I found it very confusing. There is one scene in the middle of the book around Christmas time, but most of it is during Autumn - despite this supposedly being a Christmas novella. The book does not have ghosts or spirits that visit. It also does not have a social narrative to it like the other stories do - which, to me, is what makes Dickens' books so deep and rich. This story is sadly lacking depth and I never was drawn into it.

It starts with a grotesque, macabre, and excessively gory description of a blood-soaked battlefield. Then skips forward 100 years and the main story covers 9 years from that point. The story is about extravagant and unnecessary self-sacrifice that could have been avoided if people were just willing to talk about their feelings. The only thing that made this OK to read was Dickens' incredible writing and the side story of Mr. Britain and Clemency. I think I get the idea Dickens was trying to get across but he fell short of its attempted grand delivery.

Now I'm off to read another book... but since a review should be more about the author of the book than about the writer of the blog, I will let Charles Dickens have the last words:

"Doctor Jeddler was a great philosopher and the heart and mystery of his philosophy was to look upon the world as a gigantic practical joke; as something too absurd to be considered seriously by any rational man."

Philosophy of life as told by a nutmeg-grater and a thimble:
"Do as you would be done by! Forget and forgive!"

Thursday, October 3, 2019

Nativity Story - Bible and Picture Books

The True Meaning of Christmas!

I love Christmas time and I enjoy the magic of Christmas - which I believe can include Santa Clause too, even for Christians. I know Santa can be a touchy and controversial subject, but I'm not here to debate his inclusion in your festivities or not. What I am writing this for is to admit that sometimes the true meaning of Christmas can be lost amidst the commercialism that Santa can perpetuate.

I grew up believing in Santa and that the gifts in my stocking were from him - BUT before we opened any presents on Christmas morning, we always read the Nativity Story. When I was younger, my parents read picture books and as I got older, we started reading the Bible. I've included Bible references to the Christmas Story below as well as some of my favorite Nativity picture books.

Full story in the Bible:          Shortened story from the Bible:
      Luke 1:1-2:52                       Luke 1:26-56; 2:1-21; 2:39-40    
 Matthew 1:1-2:23                           Matthew 1:18-2:23            


God's Littlest Angel by Alan and Linda Parry
This is a short story with adorable illustrations. It follows the story of Angie, the littlest angel, and how she helped God prepare for the birth of Jesus. It includes pull-tabs (pictured above), pop-ups, and flaps to open. There is also a question on each page to keep the kids engaged.


The Story of Christmas by Sally Owen
This book follows more closely to the biblical story and is a bit longer. This would be for slightly older children than the book above. Each page has a pop-up center and four flaps to open. The illustration style is also beautiful.


The First Christmas Night by Keith Christopher
This takes the rhyme and rhythm patterns from Twas the Night Before Christmas and makes it about the nativity story instead of Santa. This story isn't interactive like the first two books, but it is still engaging due to its poem-like style of writing.


Humphrey's First Christmas by Carol Heyer
This is a goofy book that follows the story of Humphrey, the conceited camel. He loses his blanket while traveling with the Wise Men but gets a new one after several funny escapades. Spoiler: He gives his precious blanket to baby Jesus in the end.

Let me know what your favorite Nativity picture books are in the comments!

Friday, September 27, 2019

All Book Reviews By Author

This page includes links to all the book reviews I have posted to this blog.
It is in alphabetical order by the author's last name, then by order of publication.

Douglas Adams (English, 1952-2001)
-The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1979)

Louisa May Alcott (American, 1832-1888)
-Behind A Mask: A Short Story Collection (1863-1874)

Mary Raymond Shipman Andrews (American, 1860-1936)
-The Whole Family (1908)

Anonymous
-Everyman and Other Miracle and Morality Plays (~1350s-1510s)
     -Noah's Flood
     -The Second Shepherd's Play
     -Everyman
     -Hickscorner

Margaret Atwood (Canadian, 1939- )
-The Handmaid's Tale (1985)

Jane Austen (English, 1775-1817)
-Persuasion (1817)

Mary Austin (American, 1868-1934)

John Kendrick Bangs (American, 1862-1922)
-The Associated Shades  Quartet (1895-1901)
-The Whole Family (1908)
L Frank Baum (American, 1856-1919)

Karin Boye (Swedish, 1900-1941)
-Kallocain (1940)

Ray Bradbury (American, 1920-2012)
-Fahrenheit 451 (1953)

Anne Bronte (English, 1820-1849)
-Agnes Grey (1847)
-The Tenant of Wildfell Hall (1848)

Charlotte Bronte (English, 1816-1855)
-Shirley (1848)
-Villette (1853)

Emily Bronte (English, 1818-1848)
-Wuthering Heights (1847)

Alice Brown (American, 1857-1948)

Dan Brown (American, 1964- )

Frances Hodgson Burnett (British-American, 1841-1924)
-A Little Princess (1905)

Sheila Burnford (British, 1918-1984)
-The Incredible Journey (1960)

Albert Camus (French-Algerian, 1913-1960)
-The Plague (1947)

Dorothy Canfield (American, 1879-1958)


Agatha Christie (English, 1890-1976)
-The Murder of Roger Ackroyd (1926)
-Death on the Nile (1937)
-A Murder is Announced (1950) - play adaptation (1977)

Marjorie Benton Cooke (American, 1876-1920)

Mary Stewart Cutting (American, 1879-1924)

Samuel R. Delany (African-American, 1942- )
-Babel-17 (1966)

Charles Dickens (English, 1812-1870)
-Dickens at Christmas (1835-1854)
     -A Christmas Carol (1843)
     -The Chimes (1844)
     -The Cricket on the Hearth (1845)
     -The Battle of Life (1846)
     -The Haunted Man and the Ghost's Bargain (1848)
     -Mini-Reviews of the Christmas Short Stories (1835-1854)

Franklin W. Dixon (Canadian, 1902-1977)
-The Tower Treasure - Hardy Boys #1 (1927)

Mary E. Wilkins Freeman (American, 1852-1930)

Niel Gaiman (English, 1960- )

Charlotte Perkins Gilman (American, 1860-1935)
-The Herland Trilogy
     -Moving the Mountain (1911)
     -Herland (1915)
     -With Her in Ourland (1916)

Elizabeth Goudge (British, 1900-1984)
-The Little White Horse (1946)

William Dean Howells (American, 1837-1920)

Fannie Hurst (American, 1885-1968)

Henrik Ibsen (Norwegian, 1828-1906)

Brian Jacques (English, 1939-2011)

Henry James (American-British, 1843-1916)
-The Bostonians (1886)
-The Whole Family (1908)

PD James (English, 1920-2014)
-The Children of Men (1992)

Jerome K. Jerome (English, 1859-1927)
-Three Men in a Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog) (1889) - didn't finish

Elizabeth Jordan (American, 1865-1947)

Matthew Kelly (Australian, 1973- )
-Perfectly Yourself (2006)

Mercedes Lackey (American, 1950- )
-Heralds of Valdemar Series

Ursula K. Le Guin (American, 1929-2018)
-Worlds of Exile and Illusion (Hainish Cycle #1-3)
     -Rocannon's World (1966)
     -Planet of Exile (1966)
     -City of Illusions (1967)
-The  Left Hand of Darkness (1969 - Hainish Cycle #4)

HP Lovecraft (American,  1890-1937)

Samuel Merwin (American, 1874-1936)

Jason Morgan (American, ?- ) and Damien Lewis (British, 1966- )

Stieg Larsson (Swedish, 1954-2004)

CS Lewis (British, 1898-1963)
-The Space Trilogy
     -Out of the Silent Planet (1938)
     -Perelandra (1943)
     -That Hideous Strength (1945)
-On Stories (1937-1968)

Astrid Lindgren (Swedish, 1907-2002)
-The Adventures of Pippi Longstocking
     -Pippi Longstocking (1945)
     -Pippi Goes on Board (1946)
     -Pippi in the South Seas (1948)
-Mio, My Son (1956)

Jane Webb Loudon (English, 1807-1858)
-The Mummy! (1827)

George MacDonald (Scottish, 1824-1905)
     -Phantastes (1858)
     -The Light Princess (1864)
     -The Giant's Heart (1864)
     -The Golden Key (1867)
     -At the Back of the North Wind (1871)
     -The Princess and the Goblin  (1872)
     -The Princess and Curdie (1883)
     -Lilith (1895)

Mike Madrid (American, 1950s(?)- )
-The Supergirls (2009)

Christopher Marlowe (English, 1564-1593)
-Dr. Faustus (1589-1592)

James McBride (American-African-Jewish, 1957- )

Alice Duer Miller (American, 1874-1966)

Dan Millman (American, 1946- )
-The Four Purposes of Life (2011)

Hope Mirrlees (British, 1887-1978)
-Lud-in-the-Mist (1926)

Erin Morgenstern
(American, 1978- )
-The Night Circus (2011)

Multiple Authors

Ethel Watts Mumford (American, 1876-1940)

Kathleen Norris (American, 1880-1966)

Anne O'Hagan (American, 1875-1932)

Delia Owens (American, 1949- )

George Orwell (English, 1903-1950)
-Animal Farm (1945)

Katherine Paterson (American, 1932- )
-Bridge to Terabithia (1977)

Tamora Pierce (American, 1954- ) 
-Circle Universe - Series
-Tortall Universe  - Series

Dave Ramsey (American, 1960- )
-Complete Guide to Money (2011)

Ayn Rand (Russian-American, 1905-1982)
-Atlas Shrugged (1957)

Ransom Riggs (American, 1979- )
-Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (2011)

Elizabeth Robins (American-British, 1862-1952)
-Votes for Women (1909)

Patrick Rothfuss (American, 1973- )

JD Salinger (American, 1919-2010)
-The Catcher in the Rye (1951)

Leroy Scott (American, 1875-1929)

William Shakespeare (English, 1564-1616)
-Four Comedies (~1590-1601)
     -The Taming of the Shrew
     -A Midsummer Night's Dream
     -As You Like It
     -Twelfth Night

George Bernard Shaw (Irish, 1856-1950)
-Press Cuttings (1909)

Robert Louis Stevenson (Scottish, 1850-1894)
-Treasure Island (1883)

Bram Stoker (Irish, 1847-1912)

Jennifer K. Stuller (American, 1975- )

JRR Tolkein (English, 1892-1973)

Amos Tutuola (Nigerian, 1920-1997)

Mark Twain (American, 1835-1910)
-The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884) - didn't finish
-Diaries of Adam and Eve (1906)

Henry Van Dyke (American, 1852-1933)

Madame de Villeneuve (French, 1695-1755)
-The Story of the Beauty and the Beast (1740)

Mary Heaton Vorse (American, 1874-1966)

Elizabeth Stuart Phelps Ward (American, 1844-1911)

Frank J Webb (African-American, 1828-1894)
-The Garies and Their Friends (1857)

Henry Kitchell Webster (American, 1874-1936)

Andy Weir (American, 1972- )

William Allen White (American, 1868-1944)

Harry Leon Wilson (American, 1867-1939)

Bill Willingham (American, 1956- )
-Fables (2002-2015, present) - comic series

Edith Wyatt (American, 1873-1958)

Rick Yancey (American, 1962- )

Adrienne Young  (American, 1985- )

Yevgeny Zamyatin (Russian, 1884-1937)
-We (1921)

Francesca Zappia (American, 1993- )

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

Three Men in a Boat by Jerome

Title: Three Men in a Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog)


Author: Jerome K. Jerome (English, 1859-1927)
Originally published: 1889



Page count: 145
Dates read: 9/22/19-9/24/19
Back to the Classics category: Classic Comedy




Read my other book reviews for the challenge HERE.



Description on back of book:
A masterpiece of British humor since its first publication in 1889. The funny boating trip of three men - Jerome and his two friends Harris and George and their dog Montmorency - along the River Thames in Oxford, crossing absurdities and traditions of late 19th century England.

Review:
I WAS going to read this as my second book for the Classic Comedy category of the Back to the Classics reading challenge, but it just was not interesting to me. I read a quarter of the book, which was five chapters, and then decided to stop. I have so many books I want to read - I just don't have time to spend on books I don't enjoy.

To be fair, there were some funny things in the first two chapters - but I quickly got bored with the humor. There didn't seem to be much of a plot and I didn't like the characters. It would follow the story for a page or two and then go off on some supposedly funny anecdotal tangent that has little to do with the actual story (and was usually about three or four pages long). I just wasn't a fan of the writing and I just didn't want to waste my time. Maybe I was just in the wrong mood.

But...Why didn't you finish the book?!

Now I'm off to read another book... but since a review should be more about the author of the book than about the writer of the blog, I will let Jerome K Jerome have the last words. These are the first two sentences of the book:

"There were four of us -George, and William Samuel Harris, and myself, and Montmorency. We were sitting in my room, smoking, and talking about how bad we were - bad from a medical point of view I mean, of course."

Why Didn't You finish the Book?

Why didn't you finish the book? In the past, I have felt guilty if I didn't finish all the books I started - maybe you've felt that way too. I thought I owed it to the book to finish it because the ending might make a so-so book really good. The thing is, I think what we really should be asking is:

Why DID you finish a book (that you didn't like)?
-It was assigned reading for class.
-It is part of your job description (most likely in academia).
-You want to speak intelligently about why you don't like a book (and in order to do that, you have to read the whole book).
*Note: If you have another reason - post it in the comments!

Those are really the only legitimate reasons I can think of to finish a book you don't like reading. Well, since I'm no longer in school and my job doesn't require the reading of novels (unfortunately), the first two reasons don't apply to me. Though I appreciate the intention behind the third reason, I don't know if you actually have to finish the book to talk intelligently about why you didn't like. I also don't know why one couldn't just say 'I didn't like it' and leave it at that.

The thing is, since I'm not reading for school or work, I'm reading in my free-time for FUN. If I'm not enjoying the book, then it's not all that fun. I don't owe it to anyone (or the book) to finish it if I don't feel like it. Just because a whole bunch of other people might like the book, it doesn't mean I (or you) have to. But what if the book turns around and has a good ending?! Well - is it worth it to drudge through a couple HUNDRED pages to get a couple of pages of a good ending? Maybe it is to you - but not to me.

At the same time, I do think that it's good to give a book a fair try. Of course, what is 'fair?' Well, I've decided to come up with a little system to help me - because I'm weird and I want to feel like I'm treating all the books I read fairly. I have a system that goes by how long the book is:

Step 1: Give the book a chance
I highly suggest reading a certain portion of each book you decide to start - your first impression may change (for better or for worse). If there's something about the book you just don't like about it, then stop reading the book however far into it you are. This system is for books that you find kinda boring, or meh, or think 'maybe it'll get better' - but nothing is really gripping you yet. If the book is:

100 pages or less - Just finish it since it's so short.

100-400 pages - Read the first quarter of the book.

400-600 pages - Read the first 100 pages.

600 pages or more - Read the first 200 pages.

Step 2: Decide if the book has potential
If you really don't like the book at this point, then stop reading it. If you still are unsure about the book but think it has potential, then continue reading up to half of the book.

Step 3: Decide if you will finish the book
If at any point from the page amount in Step 1 up to half the book you decide you really don't like it, then stop reading the book. If you decide you like the book (or that it has a high enough potential), then continue reading the book. Note: If I read beyond the halfway point, I'll finish the book.

There you have it! The system is pretty simple.

One more thing: Don't ever feel like you have to reread a book that you never finished or that left a really bad impression on you. (For me, it's The Great Gatsby from high school and, more recently, Atlas Shrugged.) BUT just because you don't like a book today, doesn't mean you won't like the book tomorrow (or sometime further in the future). There have been plenty of books I was assigned in high school that I didn't really like, but I've reread them recently and discovered I greatly enjoyed them! You might not like a book because you're in the wrong mood, you're at the wrong point of your life, or something is just going over your head. Don't be afraid to give a book you didn't like a second chance!

Books I started but didn't finish:
-20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne
-The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
-Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
-"Pauline's Passion and Punishment" by Louisa May Alcott
-Three Men in a Boat by Jerome K Jerome
-The Idylls of the King by Lord Alfred Tennyson

Books I finished but wish I hadn't wasted my time:
-Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
-The Bostonians by Henry James
-The Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger
-The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald
-Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte

Sunday, September 22, 2019

The Cricket on the Hearth by Dickens


Title: The Cricket on the Hearth


Author: Charles Dickens (English, 1812-1870)
Originally published:  1845
Page count: 91 (Av. of several versions: 110)


Dates read: 9/16/19-9/22/19
2019 book goal progress: 27 out of 41
Back to the Classics category: 
Classic Novella (under 250 pages)

Read my other Dickens at Christmas reviews HERE.

Read my other book reviews for the challenge HERE.


Description on back of book:
John Peerybingle, a carrier, lives with his young wife Dot, their baby boy and their nanny Tilly Slowboy. A cricket constantly chirps on the hearth and acts as a guardian angel to the family. One day a mysterious elderly stranger comes to visit and takes up lodging at Peerybingle's house for a few days.

First sentence:
"The kettle began it!"

Favorite quotes:
 "To have a Cricket on the Hearth is the luckiest thing in all the world!"

"You're such an undeniable good sleeper, sir, that I have half a mind to ask you where the other six are - only that would be a joke, and I know I should spoil it. Very near though, very near!"

"Caleb was no sorcerer, but in the only magic art that still remains to us, the magic of devoted, deathless love."

CAWPILE Rating: Overall - 8 - ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Characters      - 10
Atmosphere   - 8
Writing Style - 9
Plot                - 8
Intrigue          - 9
Logic             - 4
Enjoyment     - 8
What is a CAWPILE Rating?

Review:
This is a great fairy-tale story. It's almost too good to be true - but aren't most Christmas stories? This story is included in Dickens' 5 Christmas books, but it actually happens at the end of January and doesn't involve Christmas at all. (Though there is a Scrooge-like character, as well as toymakers!) The book is really about love and marriage. It opens with this wonderful personification of the kettle which made me fall in love with the story. To be fair, there were some parts that did confuse me and other parts I think the story would have been better without - but it was a great read overall. Dickens is an amazing writer that writes prose like it's poetry - I laughed, I cried, and my heart was warmed.

Now I'm off to read another book... but since a review should be more about the author of the book than about the writer of the blog, I will let Charles Dickens have the last words:

"All Crickets are potent Spirits, even though the people who hold converse with them do not know it (which is frequently the case); and there are not in the unseen world, voices more gentle and more true, that may be so implicitly relied on, or that are so certain to give none but tenderest counsel, as the Voices in which the Spirits of the Fireside and the Hearth address themselves to humankind."

But... WAIT! I have a question about the ending! The very last paragraph to be exact. I hope some of you reading this blog have read The Cricket on the Hearth for yourselves and will give me some insight on the ending.

Warning: the following contains spoilers (and the comments might have spoilers as well).

When I first read the last paragraph, I interpreted that the narrator as John and that the happy ending had all just been a vision from the cricket and that Dot had left him after all. But then I thought about how the Cricket was portrayed as a lucky and positive being and that kind of trickery just didn't seem to fit a Cricket's character. Then I thought maybe the narrator is Tilly and the last paragraph happened after everyone went to bed after the party and she was still sitting by the fire - this allows for the happy ending, but also doesn't really add anything to the story. It doesn't seem to fit.

Then I thought - what if the Cricket is the narrator? That also would allow for a happy ending and would give the story a deeper meaning than if it was Tilly. The problem was that either there's a second Cricket in the home or the Cricket speaks about itself in the third person - so maybe the Cricket isn't the narrator. Then I thought more abstract - what if the narrator is the hearth itself, which symbolizes the home, which symbolizes the love of those who live within? This would give the ending even more meaning. But... is that too abstract?

I think my main issue is the very last sentence: "A Cricket sings upon the Hearth; a broken child's toy lies upon the ground; and nothing else remains."  I initially took this to be negative, but maybe it means 'Nothing else remains but luck (Cricket), love (Hearth), and the hard work of life/marriage (broken toy).' Or maybe it isn't as abstract as I'm making it and it means 'nothing else remains to be told,' or 'they all lived happily ever after,' or simply 'the end.' If any of these be the case, then maybe John is the narrator after all - but I kind of like the narrator being the heart/home/love.

Now that I've explained the confusion I have over the ending, I want to ask two questions: Who do you think the narrator is? How did you interpret the last paragraph?